Jane Jacobs: Some Myths about Diversity

“Cities have the capability of providing something for everybody, only because, and only when, they are created by everybody.”

Alice Feldt Thoughts on Photography

This section of the Jane Jacobs book The Death and Life of Great American Cities was about the opposition’s misconceptions about diversity in the city and how they are wrong.  For Jacobs, diversity is concerning a diversity of uses of a space, not necessarily culturally or racially.  She advocates that many types of business and residences are the hallmarks of a thriving city neighborhood.  There are three main myths she identifies in this chapter.  The myths are the opposition often cited by city planners against diversity.

The first myth Jacobs addresses that diversity is ugly.  She counters this by saying the opposite is true.  That homogeneity is actually the eyesore.  There are two ways that city planners try to deal with homogeneity:  Either they make the area obviously homogeneous in uses and in style of building, which Jacobs argues is boring and disorienting.  I think of Robert Adams and the…

View original post 1,269 more words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s